By Ralph Ciprianofor BigTrial.net
Dear Jane Roh, I've got some bad news for you and your boss.
I know that part of your job as District Attorney Larry Krasner's $118,000 a-year "communications director" is to never respond to any of my questions. That's because your main objective is to prevent any of the critical Big Trial stories about your boss from migrating to The Philadelphia Inquirer, or any other media outlet.
For months, you've been quite successful at your mission. But now that's over.
This week, three Big Trial posts that take a critical look at your boss, Progressive Larry Krasner, were published in their entirety on lawenforcementtoday.com, [LET] a national police website with 38,600 followers on Twitter and about 10,000 followers on linkedin. The result: a national audience is now learning all that critical stuff about Krasner that the local media under your control has so far refused to publicize.
Jane, I know this may upset you, but here are the headlines on the three stories LET posted this week:Fallen officer's widow slams radical Philly D.A. for trying to release husband's killer.
This is how LET promoted that story on Twitter: "A cold-blooded cop-killer may walk out of jail if this D.A. gets his way. We can't let this story get swept under the rug."
Cop tries to expose corruption in Soros-funded D.A.'s office. Gets threatened with criminal charges.
On Twitter, the pitch from LET was: "This has all the elements of a government cover-up. Help us expose them."
Soros-backed Philadelphia D.A. lets two-time killer walk free:
On Twitter, LET wrote: "This police-bashing DA just allowed another killer to walk free. Let that sink in."
Ouch. Can't imagine any of your progressive friends at The Philadelphia Inquirer raking your boss over the coals like that. It's such a shame that everybody isn't a progressive.
In addition, Search Warrant, a new cop-hosted podcast, has posted the above trio of stories as well as many other Big Trial scoops about Progressive Larry Krasner on Twitter. Some of the comments from readers have been pretty interesting, such as:
"Why is this not in the news #philly @6abc @CBSPhilly @NBCPhiladelphia @Fox29philly @thephillyvoice," wrote I am CaptainAmerica.
Captain America raises a good question, why isn't the local media writing about any of the stuff? We know that at the Inquirer, they've even gone so far as to kill negative stories about Krasner.
But why isn't the Inquirer interested in what the lawyers for Maureen Faulkner, the widow of murdered police officer Danny Faulkner, have dug up about Larry Krasner's radical past? In an ongoing state Supreme Court case about perhaps the most divisive murder case in the city's history it sure looks like Progressive Larry has a conflict of interest in seeking justice for Danny Faulkner.
Why? Because Krasner formerly served on a legal team for a radical left-wing organization that Mumia Abu-Jamal, Danny Faulkner's killer, was and still is a current board member of. The "legal collective" that Krasner served on was organized to defend more than 400 protesters who got arrested at the Republican National Convention of 2000.
A legal collective that tried to get former Municipal Court Judge Seamus McCaffery recused, not only because he was a former cop, but also because the judge served as grand marshal of the Daniel Faulkner Memorial Motorcycle Run!
Sure looks like a problem to me. But apparently only Big Trial is interested in that story. And the story about the detective who went to U.S. District Court to charge that the D.A.'s office under Krasner tampered with a witness in an officer-involved shooting and tried to arrest the detective when he wouldn't back down on what he knew about that shooting.
And the story about the two-time killer that Krasner's office let go scot-free because of a $25 traffic ticket.
Or the 18 new ADAs hired by Progressive Larry who just flunked the bar exam.
The list goes on.
Oh Jane, I forgot to congratulate you for becoming part of the story! In the state Supreme Court case filed by the lawyers for Maureen Faulkner, a response brief from the D.A.'s office reveals that you were disciplined internally for that hilarious tweet about the race of the protesters targeting your boss, who were demonstrating on behalf of the slain officer's widow.
Hope Progressive Larry didn't come down too hard on you for that. Would love to know what the internal discipline involved was, if there really was any. I imagine that under your boss's progressive revolutionary front, trashing the white supporters of Danny and Maureen Faulkner probably qualified you for a merit badge
One last thing. Search Warrant actually devoted a segment to your boss and his fellow George Soros funded DAs, entitled, "Hijacking the Criminal Justice System -- Defense Attorneys Masquerading as District Attorneys."
But I can understand why you don't have the time to tune in. You're way too busy banning troublesome local reporters from attending your boss's press conferences.
Or telling those reporters no comment.
Or ignoring my emails.
Keep on fighting the revolution.
Ralph Cipriano